蚁人

第三季度全球手机份额公布：小米成国产第一_我的网站

A |     今日，市场调研机构Canalys发布2022年第三季度全球智能手机报告。    

    Illustration: Liu Xiangya/GT
Recent media reports have questioned whether a natural gas plant built to power an Amazon data center project in Texas could become the largest climate polluter in the US. The controversy, whatever the eventual outcome, offers a reality check for America's artificial intelligence (AI) drive. 
It exposes a growing contradiction: The US is racing to expand its AI capabilities, yet its protectionist trade policies are making it harder and more costly to access some of the clean-energy technologies needed to sustain that expansion. This raises a broader question: Can an energy-intensive AI race afford the costs of renewable energy protectionism?
The US is entering a new era of rising electricity demand. Data centers, the backbone of the AI economy, are emerging as one of the fastest-growing sources of power consumption. Much of that demand is still being met by fossil fuels: The International Energy Agency reports that natural gas supplies more than 40 percent of the electricity used by data centers in the US, making it their largest source of power. 
So, it's not surprising that the expansion of data centers has raised concerns over their environmental impact and the pressure they could place on local power systems and electricity bills. A Gallup survey conducted in March found that seven in 10 Americans opposed the construction of AI data centers in their local area, including 48 percent who strongly opposed such projects.
The findings point to a broader challenge for the US: The race to develop AI is increasingly becoming a race to meet growing energy needs. Addressing this challenge will require more than advances in computing technology; it will also depend on an energy system capable of delivering large amounts of reliable, affordable and cleaner power. That, in turn, will require faster development and broader deployment of clean-energy technologies, from solar power to energy storage.
Yet in the clean-energy sector, the US has increasingly relied on protectionist trade measures that limit access to cost-competitive products from global markets. The country has placed greater emphasis on expanding domestic manufacturing capacity, but rebuilding entire clean-energy supply chains at home is a costly and time-consuming process. Even if expanded domestic production is achieved, it is likely to come at a higher cost, making the deployment of renewable technologies more expensive and potentially slower.
The solar industry offers a clear illustration of this policy direction. The US has continued to expand trade barriers in the sector. Reuters reported that the US government announced on Thursday a series of price floors and a 15 percent tariff on products made from polysilicon, a raw material used in solar panels.
The challenge lies in the limited scale of the US polysilicon industry. Reuters reported that the country has two polysilicon factories. Against this backdrop, relying on domestic polysilicon production while restricting access to imports runs counter to the goal of expanding solar power in the US. The country risks creating barriers that ultimately constrain its own access to the global supply chains needed for growth.
The pressing issue for the US is the speed at which new power demand is emerging. The expansion of data centers is creating electricity needs that cannot wait for domestic clean-energy capacity to develop gradually. Global supply chains can provide the scale and speed required in the near term. By narrowing access to these sources, the US risks turning clean-energy policy into a drag on the infrastructure needed for its AI race.
The US has placed AI high on its economic and technological agenda. The outcome of this race will matter greatly, as financial markets are also watching whether America can turn its AI efforts into commercial success.
This leaves the US with a difficult choice: Can it afford the cost of clean-energy protectionism while racing to build AI infrastructure? The answer may be no. Trade barriers that limit access to competitive renewable technologies could ultimately become a constraint on the AI expansion that Washington is seeking to accelerate.
The author is a reporter with the Global Times. [email protected]

。         报告指出，今年第三季度，全球智能手机市场遭遇连续三季度下跌，同比下降9%，成为自2014年以来表现最糟糕的季度。

B |          具体来看，榜单前三的厂商为三星、苹果、小米，全球市场份额分别为22%、18%、14%。
其中，小米成为国产手机品牌第一，OPPO和vivo则以10%、9%位列榜单第四、第五。
据了解，在第三季度新机市场上，小米相继推出了徕卡旗舰小米12S系列、折叠屏旗舰小米MIX Fold 2、小米CiVi 2等新机，帮助小米在第三季度站稳全球第三的位置。另外，小米在海外市场也保持稳步开拓的状态，据小米2022年第二季度财报披露，小米在欧洲、拉美、东南亚、中东、非洲等多个区域实现手机份额的环比提升。按出货量，小米二季度在全球55个国家和地区排名前三，67个国家和地区排名前五，其中在欧洲地区市占率21.7%，排名第二。值得一提的是，今年8月，小米连续第4年位列《财富》世界500强榜单，排名第266位，是同时间段内排位上升最快的中国科技公司，全球市场的实力得到认可。

Current article:http://ozv1r.liawucunsainantaonao.sbs/news/20260826_34304.html

Published on:00:00:00